From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19898 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2012 07:52:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 19872 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jul 2012 07:52:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mta-out.inet.fi (HELO kirsi1.inet.fi) (195.156.147.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:52:25 +0000 Received: from sauna (84.248.66.131) by kirsi1.inet.fi (8.5.140.03) id 4FD08A2302265789; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:52:22 +0300 Received: from lindi by sauna with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqg6Q-0002gf-Gs; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:52:22 +0300 From: Timo Juhani Lindfors To: peng yu Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: Re: add an option, let the systemtap doesn't check whether the probe point is at the start of an assembly instruction References: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (peng yu's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:07:51 +0800") Message-ID: <84ipdo2le1.fsf@sauna.l.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 peng yu writes: > Below is a patch, I test it on the systemtap-1.8, after apply the > patch, we can use a '-i' option when call stap command, let the > systemtap don't do the address valid check. As a user it sounds bit dangerous to use a short option for something like this.