From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-26103-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 122413 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2018 20:48:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 122245 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2018 20:48:04 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:48:03 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CC087A71;	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:48:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from toium (unused-10-15-17-37.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.37])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9492026D65;	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:48:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lukas Berk <lberk@redhat.com>
To: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
Cc: systemtap <systemtap@sourceware.org>,  Anton Kiryushkin <swood@fotofor.biz>
Subject: Re: freezes stap
References: <CAM_jxg3-3Uh6i6W9=csqs+OsVs+9dPNfVwTcoi017rquV3e7Tw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKFOr-awuzc0i1B95K6+cJs5cJpJwZOnguwYpKNTpQDAgs8pAQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAM_jxg3x9-0RmqqmTAZh+6OQ-+A9s7Uk5zN=J6h31eRtyS7hqg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKFOr-bD1JP1e4qbC+vRroeUicn5q9gAqcCqiCejWRSpN8_r=A@mail.gmail.com>	<87y3e26ngs.fsf@redhat.com>	<CAKFOr-Yc++fbfN_FOtP8enV7sP10RrbG7jjbSGMHk+uxXBXsjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:48:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAKFOr-Yc++fbfN_FOtP8enV7sP10RrbG7jjbSGMHk+uxXBXsjw@mail.gmail.com>	(David Smith's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:01:28 -0500")
Message-ID: <87muuh65mm.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-q3/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2

Hey David,

David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com> writes:
[...]
> Basically, each probe type has its own rules. Plus the probe types
> don't really know about each other. Doing what you suggest might be
> doable, but tricky.

Right, that makes sense, but in the base case (reported by Anton), it
might still be reasonable first step to exit out if we note that the
number of registration errors equals the number of targeted probe
points.

Cheers,
Lukas