From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3516 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2007 20:34:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3495 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2007 20:34:00 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:33:56 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s8so1120014wxc for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.117.1 with SMTP id p1mr9062144wxc.1169930034207; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.35.18 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:33:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f3aa8d60701271233o62c2c5d1w7511ce26d944d93c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:34:00 -0000 From: "Martin Bligh" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives Cc: "Willy Tarreau" , "Jan Dittmer" , "Mathieu Desnoyers" , Ingo@maccavity.nachtwache.org, Christoph@maccavity.nachtwache.org, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hellwig , "Linus Torvalds" , Molnar , ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, "Paul Mackerras" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Douglas Niehaus" In-Reply-To: <20070127123004.ea422fe4.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <11697417541743-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> <20070127021834.e26e955d.akpm@osdl.org> <20070127181116.GA5158@Krystal> <20070127120512.04a98fcd.akpm@osdl.org> <20070127200910.GC24090@1wt.eu> <20070127123004.ea422fe4.akpm@osdl.org> Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 > > Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? > > > > http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ > > > > No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with > scary-looking results. > > Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of > cross-compiler binaries? That's going to be tricky, even if they're statically linked, what architecture do you want them for, etc? Plus some things seem to just refuse to statically link now (anything with resolver code, though maybe gcc doesn't care). If we can get the crosstool configs to build all that stuff ourselves, for any platform, would be more flexible, IMHO. M.