From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32584 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2006 15:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 32574 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2006 15:41:31 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mga03.intel.com (HELO mga03.intel.com) (143.182.124.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:41:21 +0000 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by mga03.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2006 08:41:18 -0700 Received: from scsmsx331.sc.intel.com (HELO scsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.3.90.4]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2006 08:41:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,325,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="132700707:sNHT7537460721" Received: from scsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.3.90.33]) by scsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:41:14 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Summary of nightly testing 20061016 (failed to retrieve return value location) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <9AE298E00BCF7B469C04BE82FCE78B8701AC14BF@scsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Summary of nightly testing 20061016 (failed to retrieve return value location) Thread-Index: AcbyvHwLlcg4Fi6aRWeGZH7uhNoVlQADdRlg From: "Nguyen, Thang P" To: "William Cohen" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2006 15:41:14.0545 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8287210:01C6F2CB] X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 Hi Will, Sorry for the confusion. The test I used=20 ./testsuite/systemtap.samples/tcptest.exp (tcptest.stp) Occasionally it fails due to TCP traffic, but not "$return" error. Thang -----Original Message----- From: William Cohen [mailto:wcohen@redhat.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:51 AM To: Nguyen, Thang P Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Summary of nightly testing 20061016 (failed to retrieve return value location) Nguyen, Thang P wrote: >>The tcptest.stp failed on most of the platforms. When trying to >=20 > compile >=20 >>the script by hand it gets a number of errors: >> "failed to retrieve return value location: identifier '$return'" >> >>For >>install/share/systemtap/tapset/tcp.stp:159:9 >>install/share/systemtap/tapset/tcp.stp:129:9 >> >>This is looking like there might be a problem with the >>debuginformation for some of the kernels. >> >>-Will >=20 >=20 > I could not reproduce any "$return" error on my boxes (ia32 & x86_64). > Looks like Bibo also had this problem earlier, not sure if he still sees > the issue, or if any resolution has been made. See the thread below. >=20 > http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2006-q3/msg00130.html >=20 > http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2006-q3/msg00129.html >=20 > On the other hand, I do see the tcp_test.exp fails occasionally when TCP > traffic on the test machine is really low, so the test itself may be > part of the problem. I just need to twist tcp_test.exp to send/receive > more packets when it is executed. This should reduce the number of > failure, and perhaps isolate the cases where the real "$return" errors > appear. >=20 > Thang Hi Thang, That is a different test. The test that is having the problem is: ./testsuite/systemtap.samples/tcptest.stp There is another buildok test that has a similar name. Are you able to run the complete tests and get similar results to what was=20 posted earlier in terms of number of successes and failures? -Will