From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: David McRay <mcmggradty1991@gmail.com>, systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: It's confused that local variable's value not change in function.return probe.
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:37:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMsr+YEM21=RpEYo6+1fw87B4Mifu=NwSd8dN5oVd8=OiSFdOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtxgr9mu.fsf@redhat.com>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 01:21, Frank Ch. Eigler via Systemtap <
systemtap@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> David McRay wrote:
>
> > It's confused that local variable's value not change in function.return
> > probe. [...]
> >>>>> running stap <<<<
> > gcc tests/TestStap.c -O0 -o build/TestStapC -ggdb -gdwarf
> >
> > # stap tracker.stp -c ./build/TestStapC
> > WARNING: confusing usage, consider @entry($a->$) in .return probe:
> > identifier '$a$' at scripts/track_cplusplus/track_c.stp:11:28
> > source: printf("return a: %s\n", $a$)
>
> The warning message is on topic. If in a .return probe, you access a
> general $context variable, this refers to a saved snapshot of the
> variable as evaluated at function-entry time. See also [man stapprobes]
>
I never found that especially confusing, but I can see how the message
might be improved.
- WARNING: confusing usage, consider @entry($a->$)
+ WARNING: value of $a is captured at function entry and will not reflect
any changes made since; consider explicitly using @entry($a->$)
or something like that?
Or a subhead hint in "man stapprobes" like "See also [man stapprobes]
heading MORE ON RETURN PROBES".
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 6:40 David McRay
2021-01-10 17:20 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-01-13 4:37 ` Craig Ringer [this message]
2021-01-13 8:59 ` David McRay
2021-01-14 21:47 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMsr+YEM21=RpEYo6+1fw87B4Mifu=NwSd8dN5oVd8=OiSFdOA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=craig@2ndquadrant.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=mcmggradty1991@gmail.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).