public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guang Lei Li <liguangl@cn.ibm.com>
To: Hien Nguyen <hien@us.ibm.com>
Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: return probe not executed on SMP system
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF18981512.2A2075F9-ON482570AF.000985DF-482570AF.000C01AB@cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436AB51D.9040307@us.ibm.com>

Hien Nguyen <hien@us.ibm.com> wrote on 2005-11-04 09:10:53:

> Hi,
> After looking deep into this issue I found out the problem is in the 
> stpd. The sptd unloads the systemtap module a little too early before 
> the return probes have a chance to fire their handlers.
> 
> If you have the systemtap src tree try this tempory_fix.patch. I will 
> file a bugzilla tomorrow.
> 
> Hien.
> 
I applied your patch, and I also raise the maxaction from 1 to 10, then
it worked really well, all return probed are caught.

But the default setting of maxaction to 1 is too low for a multi-processor
system. It will cause a lot of misses of kretprobe(I counter it on Power5
system for a while, about 2000 kprobes are caught, but only about 400
kretprobe was caught, so about 1600 kretprobes are missed)

I read the "kernel/kprobes.c", and found:

/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
if (rp->maxactive <= 0) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
                rp->maxactive = max(10, 2 * NR_CPUS);
#else
                rp->maxactive = NR_CPUS;
#endif
        }

Is it appropriate to just delete "if (rp->maxactive <= 0)", to change the 
above block as:

#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
     rp->maxactive = max(10, 2 * NR_CPUS);
#else
     rp->maxactive = NR_CPUS;
#endif

so that kretprobe will never miss on a multi-processor system?

Thanks for your help.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-03 14:01 Guang Lei Li
2005-11-03 16:58 ` Hien Nguyen
2005-11-04  1:11 ` Hien Nguyen
2005-11-04  2:11   ` Guang Lei Li [this message]
2005-11-04  5:03     ` Hien Nguyen
2005-11-04  5:34       ` Guang Lei Li
2005-11-04  6:06         ` Hien Nguyen
2005-11-04  6:15         ` Hien Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF18981512.2A2075F9-ON482570AF.000985DF-482570AF.000C01AB@cn.ibm.com \
    --to=liguangl@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=hien@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).