From: Guang Lei Li <liguangl@cn.ibm.com>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Cc: fche@elastic.org, hien@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: kernel panic when kretprobe all system calls
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF868AE59B.FC844E45-ON482570B3.000DA5B1-482570B3.000DCF48@cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <433819DC.9020708@us.ibm.com>
systemtap-owner@sources.redhat.com wrote on 2005-09-26 23:55:08:
> Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> >Hi -
> >
> >>[... kretprobes on syscalls ...]
> >
> >This has been seen before, and is being tracked as bug #1345 in
> >bugzilla. It has apparently been reproduced by the kretprobes
> >developers and is being debugged. More RAM seems to trigger the
> >bug less often.
> >
> >- FChE
> >
> It helps if we don't insert return probes in sys_calls such as
> sys_execve, sys_exit, sys_groupexit. Frank, can we tempory put an
> retprobe embargo policy on those system calls?
>
> Hien.
>
Hi, how is the bug #1345 going now? I ran the latest systemTap to probe
all returns of syscalls on my x86, and still got kernel panic. Although
I didn't meet the same problem on my Power5 system, I think it is due to
the large RAM of it(15G)
I looked into the comments in the bugzilla, and found Hien has worked
out a fix for i386. But he abandoned his idea because of not portable.
So at present, will I avoid this problem only by not probing the return
of those syscalls in the blacklist? Is there a better solution now?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-08 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-24 18:05 lglyahoo-news
2005-09-24 19:42 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2005-09-26 15:55 ` Hien Nguyen
2005-09-26 16:03 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2005-09-26 16:28 ` Hien Nguyen
2005-11-08 2:31 ` Guang Lei Li [this message]
2005-11-10 0:37 ` Jim Keniston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF868AE59B.FC844E45-ON482570B3.000DA5B1-482570B3.000DCF48@cn.ibm.com \
--to=liguangl@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@elastic.org \
--cc=hien@us.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).