* Problem using bulk mode (relayfs)
@ 2007-02-16 21:18 Perry Cheng
2007-02-19 20:46 ` David Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Perry Cheng @ 2007-02-16 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
I am having trouble running stap in bulk mode on a script that otherwise
works fine. That is, I normally run with just "-g" but with "-g -b" it no
longer works. Here's the output with one -v. Is this a known problem?
OS version: 2.6.16 modified with various real-time patches
stap version: (version 0.5.13 built 2007-02-12) (Using Red Hat
elfutils 0.125 libraries.)
Pass 1: parsed user script and 54 library script(s) in 260usr/0sys/269real
ms.
Pass 2: analyzed script: 6 probe(s), 14 function(s), 3 embed(s), 0
global(s) in 300usr/60sys/356real ms.
Pass 3: using cached
/gsa/watgsa/home/p/e/perryche/.systemtap/cache/4a/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.c
Pass 4: using cached
/gsa/watgsa/home/p/e/perryche/.systemtap/cache/4a/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko
Pass 5: starting run.
insmod: error inserting
'/tmp/stapUcDLAt/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko': -1
Unknown symbol in module
ERROR, couldn't insmod probe module
/tmp/stapUcDLAt/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko
Pass 5: run completed in 0usr/10sys/30real ms.
Pass 5: run failed. Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.
Increasing the level of verbosity generates no error/warnings in Passes
1-4 and no additional output in the failing Pass 5.
Perry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem using bulk mode (relayfs)
2007-02-16 21:18 Problem using bulk mode (relayfs) Perry Cheng
@ 2007-02-19 20:46 ` David Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Smith @ 2007-02-19 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Perry Cheng; +Cc: systemtap
Perry Cheng wrote:
> I am having trouble running stap in bulk mode on a script that otherwise
> works fine. That is, I normally run with just "-g" but with "-g -b" it no
> longer works. Here's the output with one -v. Is this a known problem?
>
> OS version: 2.6.16 modified with various real-time patches
> stap version: (version 0.5.13 built 2007-02-12) (Using Red Hat
> elfutils 0.125 libraries.)
>
> Pass 1: parsed user script and 54 library script(s) in 260usr/0sys/269real
> ms.
> Pass 2: analyzed script: 6 probe(s), 14 function(s), 3 embed(s), 0
> global(s) in 300usr/60sys/356real ms.
> Pass 3: using cached
> /gsa/watgsa/home/p/e/perryche/.systemtap/cache/4a/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.c
> Pass 4: using cached
> /gsa/watgsa/home/p/e/perryche/.systemtap/cache/4a/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko
> Pass 5: starting run.
> insmod: error inserting
> '/tmp/stapUcDLAt/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko': -1
> Unknown symbol in module
> ERROR, couldn't insmod probe module
> /tmp/stapUcDLAt/stap_4aca05003686bb4d8c3530e87c8a2d4d_11456.ko
> Pass 5: run completed in 0usr/10sys/30real ms.
> Pass 5: run failed. Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.
>
> Increasing the level of verbosity generates no error/warnings in Passes
> 1-4 and no additional output in the failing Pass 5.
I haven't seen this before, but you might try looking at the output of
dmesg or looking in /var/log/messages (depending on how your system is
configured) for a better error message from the equivalent of insmod.
Hopefully you'll get the name of the unknown symbol. If that doesn't
work, try running insmod yourself on the cached module and see what you get.
--
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-19 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-16 21:18 Problem using bulk mode (relayfs) Perry Cheng
2007-02-19 20:46 ` David Smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).