From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20714 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2006 15:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 20658 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2006 15:35:32 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,DK_POLICY_TESTING,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA (HELO rubicon.netdirect.ca) (216.16.235.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:35:27 +0000 X-Originating-Ip: 72.57.81.197 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (CPE00062588f1b6-CM001225dbafb6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [72.57.81.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by rubicon.netdirect.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kALFYqxF015954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:35:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:36:00 -0000 From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" cc: Systemtap Mailing List Subject: Re: alloc.c:66: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.8, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > "Robert P. J. Day" writes: > > > newbie alert here. i'm trying to run one of the simple examples for > > systemtap and i'm getting precisely the error described here: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/systemtap/2006-q4/msg00428.html > > [...] > > Yeah, this is a known bug, corrected in ... wait for it ... CVS. so subversion was a little too cutting edge, was it? :-) > We're planning to package fedora updates only a couple of weeks from > now. > > > my current (unadulterated) system configuration is: [...] > > If you're up for a little bit of adultery (and, running a fresh git > kernel, surely you are!), try building systemtap out of CVS. sure, i can give that a shot. am i right in thinking that this is just an issue when CONFIG_SMP is selected? at least, when i peruse alloc.c, that's what it looks like. rday