* [Bug translator/12221] New: Include build-ids in the script hash
@ 2010-11-15 22:59 jistone at redhat dot com
2010-11-15 23:20 ` [Bug translator/12221] " mjw at redhat dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-15 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221
Summary: Include build-ids in the script hash
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: translator
AssignedTo: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: jistone@redhat.com
Now that PR9937 is done, I'm seeing some testsuite failures where the runtime
fails due to mismatched userspace build-ids. In a few cases, we get binaries
that are similar enough that our probe addresses and such are the same, so our
caching reuses the ko, but the build-ids are actually different. If we can
include the build-id in the script's hash, this should be resolved.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug translator/12221] Include build-ids in the script hash 2010-11-15 22:59 [Bug translator/12221] New: Include build-ids in the script hash jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-15 23:20 ` mjw at redhat dot com 2010-11-16 0:13 ` jistone at redhat dot com 2010-11-16 2:26 ` jistone at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-15 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221 Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjw at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> 2010-11-15 23:18:11 UTC --- Is this related to Bug 11735 - similarly named executables/libraries get probed/detected wrongly http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11735 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/12221] Include build-ids in the script hash 2010-11-15 22:59 [Bug translator/12221] New: Include build-ids in the script hash jistone at redhat dot com 2010-11-15 23:20 ` [Bug translator/12221] " mjw at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-16 0:13 ` jistone at redhat dot com 2010-11-16 2:26 ` jistone at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-16 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221 --- Comment #2 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> 2010-11-16 00:12:18 UTC --- Yes, I suspect this is the same. Though in your test, usymbols.exp, it's not even probing the app in question, just using symbol data about it. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/12221] Include build-ids in the script hash 2010-11-15 22:59 [Bug translator/12221] New: Include build-ids in the script hash jistone at redhat dot com 2010-11-15 23:20 ` [Bug translator/12221] " mjw at redhat dot com 2010-11-16 0:13 ` jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-16 2:26 ` jistone at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-11-16 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221 Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> 2010-11-16 02:26:15 UTC --- I added commits for PR11735 which I suspect are enough for most practical cases. I'll leave this PR open though, since someone had already thought to comment in the code that adding build-ids might be better. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-12221-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug translator/12221] Include build-ids in the script hash [not found] <bug-12221-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> @ 2011-08-30 14:59 ` cmeek at redhat dot com 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: cmeek at redhat dot com @ 2011-08-30 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221 cmeek@redhat.com <cmeek at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmeek at redhat dot com AssignedTo|systemtap at sourceware dot |cmeek at redhat dot com |org | -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-30 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-15 22:59 [Bug translator/12221] New: Include build-ids in the script hash jistone at redhat dot com
2010-11-15 23:20 ` [Bug translator/12221] " mjw at redhat dot com
2010-11-16 0:13 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-11-16 2:26 ` jistone at redhat dot com
[not found] <bug-12221-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-08-30 14:59 ` cmeek at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).