[Bug translator/13143] process.library("libfoo.so").function(ADDRESS).call/return fail to resolve

["brolley at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13143

--- Comment #4 from Dave Brolley <brolley at redhat dot com> 2011-08-30 19:51:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Looks like it is working as designed.  
> 
> probe process ("libfoo.so").library("libfoo.so").function(0x55e).call 
>  maps to and seems to behave identical to:
> probe process ("libfoo.so").function(0x55e).call
> 
> query_addr has this check.
>           if ((tag == DW_TAG_subprogram && !q->has_inline) ||
>               (tag == DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine &&
>                !q->has_call && !q->has_return))
> which in the above case is checking
> tag == DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
> q->has_call == true
> 
> and thus it fails.
> 
> For the case where a probe is added to libfoofunc then the check becomes
> tag == DW_TAG_subprogram
> q->has_inline == true

So are you saying that it's not resolving because the function libfoofunc was
inlined (because it was empty)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.