public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jistone at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug translator/14369] New: Markers with $vars are reported "not found" when missing debuginfo
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14369-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14369

             Bug #: 14369
           Summary: Markers with $vars are reported "not found" when
                    missing debuginfo
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
        AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: jistone@redhat.com
    Classification: Unclassified


This is related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841057

As noted there: When we locate an SDT marker, stap takes different paths
depending on the presence of $vars in the handler.  Without any $var, we just
build the probe directly, and life is good.  With a $var, we decide we need
debuginfo, and so that goes down the query_addr path.

Now, if there's anything wrong with the debuginfo, then we end up throwing up
entirely with "semantic error: no match".  An unreachable $var is a problem,
sure, but we should use the right error.  And this also means that @defined()
can't work around this issue.

It doesn't even have to be corrupt debuginfo, as rhbz841057.  Even our sdt_asm
test binary can show this, when you don't have DWARF in part of a file.

First, with no DWARF at all:
> $ gcc ../testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt_asm.S -o sdt_asm.x
> $ ./run-stap -e 'probe process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") { println($foo) }' -p2 
> WARNING: cannot find module /home/jistone/systemtap/build/sdt_asm.x debuginfo: No DWARF information found
> semantic error: while resolving probe point: identifier 'process' at <input>:1:7
>         source: probe process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") { println($foo) }
>                       ^
> 
> semantic error: no match
> Pass 2: analysis failed.  Try again with another '--vp 01' option.

With some DWARF added (but nothing meaningful near asm probes):
> $ gcc ../testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt_asm.S -o sdt_asm.x -g
> $ ./run-stap -e 'probe process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") { println($foo) }' -p2 
> semantic error: while resolving probe point: identifier 'process' at <input>:1:7
>         source: probe process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") { println($foo) }
>                       ^
> 
> semantic error: no match
> Pass 2: analysis failed.  Try again with another '--vp 01' option.

And just to sanity check that the probe points do exist:
> $ ./run-stap -e 'probe process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") { println(1) }' -p2 
> # probes
> process("/home/jistone/systemtap/build/sdt_asm.x").statement(0x4004ab) /* pc=.absolute+0x4ab */ /* <- process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("memory") = process("./sdt_asm.x").statement(0x4004ab) <- process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") */
> process("/home/jistone/systemtap/build/sdt_asm.x").statement(0x4004b1) /* pc=.absolute+0x4b1 */ /* <- process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("a") = process("./sdt_asm.x").statement(0x4004b1) <- process("./sdt_asm.x").mark("*") */
[...]

We ought to fall back on this direct method when the query_addr path fails, and
then the $foo can fail later (if it even survives optimization).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-18  2:52 jistone at redhat dot com [this message]
2012-07-18  7:21 ` [Bug translator/14369] " mjw at redhat dot com
2012-07-18 22:22 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2012-08-18  1:53 ` jistone at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14369-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).