* [Bug testsuite/14390] New: separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED
@ 2012-07-23 21:48 jistone at redhat dot com
2012-07-31 10:26 ` [Bug testsuite/14390] " mjw at redhat dot com
2013-01-29 18:24 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2012-07-23 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14390
Bug #: 14390
Summary: separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: jistone@redhat.com
Classification: Unclassified
With the current inode-uprobes, we don't have any mechanism to do .return
probes. Many of our uprobes testsuite assume that .return always comes along
for the ride, so we currently get many failures just due to missing .return.
As much as possible, we should split up uprobes tests that may work partly with
and without .return probes, and then mark tests UNSUPPORTED where appropriate.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/14390] separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED 2012-07-23 21:48 [Bug testsuite/14390] New: separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED jistone at redhat dot com @ 2012-07-31 10:26 ` mjw at redhat dot com 2013-01-29 18:24 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2012-07-31 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14390 Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjw at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> 2012-07-31 10:26:26 UTC --- This is also affecting at least at_var.exp and global_var.exp which test various combinations of @var() with things like @entry() and so rely on being able to set return probes and check the results. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/14390] separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED 2012-07-23 21:48 [Bug testsuite/14390] New: separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED jistone at redhat dot com 2012-07-31 10:26 ` [Bug testsuite/14390] " mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-01-29 18:24 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2013-01-29 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14390 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |fche at redhat dot com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> 2013-01-29 18:24:14 UTC --- commit 9c41fd et al. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-29 18:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-07-23 21:48 [Bug testsuite/14390] New: separate process.**.return tests and mark UNSUPPORTED jistone at redhat dot com 2012-07-31 10:26 ` [Bug testsuite/14390] " mjw at redhat dot com 2013-01-29 18:24 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).