* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-24 19:52 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-24 19:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-24 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjw at redhat dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
2013-06-24 19:52 ` [Bug translator/15671] " mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-24 19:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 9:23 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-24 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #1 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
Here's what information I see after running
"eu-readelf -N --debug-dump=info /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/stap.debug"
====
...
[ a381f] member
name (strp) "morehelp"
decl_file (data1) 2
decl_line (data1) 125
type (GNU_ref_alt) [ 7c]
external (flag_present) Yes
declaration (flag_present) Yes
...
[ d8509] variable
specification (ref_udata) [ a381f]
decl_file (data1) 10
decl_line (data2) 2012
linkage_name (strp) "_ZN17systemtap_session8morehelpE"
location (exprloc)
[ 0] addr +0x466028
...
====
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
2013-06-24 19:52 ` [Bug translator/15671] " mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-24 19:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 9:23 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 9:37 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
/usr/bin/stap -ve 'probe process.mark("pass*") { printf("%p\n",
@var("morehelp@session.cxx")) }' -c '/usr/bin/stap --help'
Seems to work on RHEL6 with systemtap-1.8-7.el6.x86_64 (although at runtime the
@var seems to resolve to NULL).
Gives "semantic error: target-symbol requires debuginfo: operator '@var'" on
Fedora 19 pre-release with systemtap-2.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64.
Also fails with git version of translator/driver (version 2.3/0.155, commit
release-2.2.1-175-gb5ca36b). But only on the system installed /usr/bin/stap but
not on itself. (On itself it also works at runtime.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 9:23 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 9:37 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 10:22 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
In my case morehelp isn't a global variable, and it hasn't since commit e2012a.
So I guess the error message is really correct. In the failing cases for me the
stap binary really doesn't have a "morehelp" global variable. That doesn't seem
to match David's observation in comment #1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 9:37 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 10:22 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 10:47 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
Actually that doesn't explain it. Now I am somewhat confused why a git version
of systemtap works on itself. That also shouldn't work.
@var("morehelp@session.cxx") shouldn't resolve in that case either. Why does
it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 10:22 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 10:47 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 10:59 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
So looks like we also match on the "short name" of a C++ class variable, messy,
but convenient in this case.
It also works (on itself) with --enable-pie. So maybe what is happening is that
the @var() (type) lookup gets confused by the dwz split in the installed
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 10:47 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 10:59 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 15:54 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> So maybe what is happening is
> that the @var() (type) lookup gets confused by the dwz split in the
> installed package.
That seems to be it because I can trigger the same failure when running dwz -m
on the local build. I am at a loss where the problem.lookup failure originates
in the source code though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 10:59 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 15:54 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 16:12 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jistone at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
FWIW, agentzh's patch for PR11096 reworks @var a fair bit, and the example here
works just fine.
But I've also determined that $var can show the issue, and this is also only a
problem in the mark("pass5*"), not mark("pass[12346]*").
$ ./run-stap -e 'probe process.mark("pass4*") { println($$name, $s->verbose) }'
-c /usr/bin/stap -p4
/home/jistone/.systemtap/cache/e0/stap_e0bc68b472d4982509234edc9c5ee57e_1907.ko
$ ./run-stap -e 'probe process.mark("pass5*") { println($$name, $s->verbose) }'
-c /usr/bin/stap -p4
semantic error: target-symbol requires debuginfo: identifier '$s' at
<input>:1:48
source: probe process.mark("pass5*") { println($$name, $s->verbose) }
^
Pass 2: analysis failed. [man error::pass2]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 15:54 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 16:12 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2013-06-25 16:25 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2013-06-26 16:04 ` mjw at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #8 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
AFAICS the problem starts in query_addr(), which calls dwflpp::getscopes(addr)
and gets nothing back, so it returns without creating the probe. Then
sdt_query::handle_probe_entry() takes that as a sign to create a
"debuginfoless" probe with a NULL scope_die, and without a scope the $var
expansion isn't even attempted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 16:12 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-25 16:25 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2013-06-26 16:04 ` mjw at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-25 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
--- Comment #9 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
Also, while dwflpp does a lot of caching, dwflpp::getscopes(Dwarf_Addr pc) is a
straight call to dwarf_getscopes(cu, pc, &return_ptr). That cu came from
query_addr's earlier dwflpp::query_cu_containing_address(addr), which just goes
to dwfl_module_addrdie().
There is a difference that dwarf_getscopes' pc has the module bias removed, but
we've already asserted this bias matches that returned by
dwfl_module_addrdie(). (And besides, the other pass* marks don't have any bias
issue.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/15671] systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use
2013-06-24 19:39 [Bug translator/15671] New: systemtap (rpm version) can't find debuginfo for @var() use dsmith at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-25 16:25 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-26 16:04 ` mjw at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-26 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org |mjw at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
This was caused by (2) bugs in elfutils dwarf_getscopes.
Patch posted
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2013-June/003110.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread