public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mjw at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug runtime/16553] New: unwind stack code shouldn't need pragma:uprobes if it isn't used for user space probing
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-16553-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16553

            Bug ID: 16553
           Summary: unwind stack code shouldn't need pragma:uprobes if it
                    isn't used for user space probing
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: mjw at redhat dot com

The following commit introduced a dependency on uprobes for the stack/unwind
code:

commit 6a80494e753367b7096a928705312dfdfa437201
Author: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org>
Date:   Fri May 7 12:57:50 2010 -0400

    PR11573: infer need for uprobes from special embedded-c markup tag

    * tapset/ucontext-unwind.stp: Mark up these babies with /* pragma:uprobes
*/
    * elaborate.cxx (typeresolution_info::visit_embeddedcode): Look for that
      and activate session.need_uprobes if found.

This was introduced to solve Bug 11573 - uprobe_get_pc, sayonara.

See specifically runtime/stack.c (_stp_stack_unwind_one_user) which does:

#ifdef STAPCONF_UPROBE_GET_PC
        maybe_pc = 0;
        if (ri) {
                maybe_pc = uprobe_get_pc(ri, UNW_PC(info), UNW_SP(info));
                if (!maybe_pc)
                        printk("SYSTEMTAP ERROR: uprobe_get_return returned
0\n");
                else
                        UNW_PC(info) = maybe_pc;
        }
#endif

Which is needed whenever there might be any uretprobes installed to fix up any
addresses which might point to trampoline code instead of the original pc.

To make sure that code can be executed all unwinding/ubacktrace tapset
functions now have a pragma:uprobes. But if uprobes wasn't actually used to set
u[ret]probes then this is too strict a requirement.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-16553-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).