From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-22398-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6851 invoked by alias); 6 May 2014 18:17:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 6808 invoked by uid 48); 6 May 2014 18:17:26 -0000
From: "jistone at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug translator/16914] probe syscall.* fails with compilation error
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 18:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap
X-Bugzilla-Component: translator
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jistone at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-16914-6586-e88pt9PU6n@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16914-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16914-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-q2/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16914

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jistone at redhat dot com

--- Comment #4 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Martin Cermak from comment #0)
> kernel-3.13.0-0.rc7.31.sa2.bz1094366.aarch64 (3.13.0-0.rc7.31 + rhbz1094366 fix)

This kernel does have CONFIG_COMPAT=y, but I don't think that's typical for
that product.  Regardless, we need to be prepared for the possibility.

(In reply to Martin Cermak from comment #3)
> (In reply to David Smith from comment #2)
> > Does aarch64 run 32-bit executables?
> My *guess* is that it doesn't. Certainly gcc doesn't support -m32.

The architecture does support 32-bit, but distros might choose not to enable it
in the kernel or toolchain.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.