From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31556 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2014 15:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31356 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2014 15:39:25 -0000 From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug runtime/17101] [rfe] timeout for stap Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap X-Bugzilla-Component: runtime X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dsmith at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17101 --- Comment #8 from David Smith --- Hmm, I wonder if this rc file modification will work exactly the way we'd like. I could see where the testcase would just ignore the new output and not fail properly. Martin, are there certain tests in the testsuite where you have the most problems with missing timeout behavior? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.