From: "peter at peca dot dk" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug uprobes/17623] Sometimes probes fail to fire events when running against a multi-threaded application
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17623-6586-KIUzNpgZOs@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-17623-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17623
--- Comment #6 from Peter Allin <peter at peca dot dk> ---
(In reply to David Smith from comment #5)
> On my F20 vm (3.16.3-200.fc20.x86_64), your test program and script worked
> fine (even at WAIT_US 1). What kernel are you running?
That sounds promising :-) I am running a kernel supplied by the Ubuntu project,
they call it "3.13.0-24-generic #47-Ubuntu". I am working remotely today, and
won't risk loosing access to the server by messing a kernel upgrade up (got to
get that remote power switch configured..), but I'll defintely try upgrading it
on monday.
> When you finally stopped systemtap, did it report any skipped probes?
No I haven't seen any such reports. I stop it either by ctrl-c or by running it
under the "timeout" command. Could these ways of stopping it inhibit messages
about skipped probes?
> Depending on what you get with test2.stp, can I ask you to try with HEAD
> systemtap and see what you get?
The behavior is consistent with my version of the script. If I run the
testprogram with the -c option of stap, I gets equals counts. When I run the
test program in the background only "func1" is counted. (I don't know if this
could give any hints, if I switch the order of the probes in the .stp file, it
is "func2" that works).
Given this result, whould it make sense to try out the HEAD systemtap?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-19 13:51 [Bug uprobes/17623] New: " peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-19 13:51 ` [Bug uprobes/17623] " peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-19 14:39 ` fche at redhat dot com
2014-11-20 7:49 ` peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-20 7:54 ` peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-20 17:04 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2014-11-21 7:31 ` peter at peca dot dk [this message]
2014-11-21 14:45 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2014-11-23 7:40 ` peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-23 7:53 ` peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-23 16:49 ` peter at peca dot dk
2014-11-24 15:17 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2014-11-25 10:24 ` peter at peca dot dk
2021-05-03 22:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-17623-6586-KIUzNpgZOs@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).