From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20199 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2015 21:58:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19812 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2015 21:58:28 -0000 From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/17928] A number of the systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp tests fail on 32-bit arm because size_t sign extended to 64-bit value Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap X-Bugzilla-Component: tapsets X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dsmith at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17928 --- Comment #11 from David Smith --- (In reply to William Cohen from comment #10) > Created attachment 8113 [details] > Revised patch that also fixes size argument for __syscall.recv The patch looks fine to me. Go ahead and check it in. Could you also attach a new systemtap.log for me to look at? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.