* [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. @ 2015-06-22 10:14 mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` [Bug tapsets/18571] " mcermak at redhat dot com ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-22 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571 Bug ID: 18571 Summary: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. Product: systemtap Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tapsets Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org Reporter: mcermak at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- The bpf syscall needs tapset support and test coverage. Syscall seccomp needs test coverage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/18571] Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. 2015-06-22 10:14 [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 8:06 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` mcermak at redhat dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571 --- Comment #1 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> --- Created attachment 8386 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8386&action=edit proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/18571] Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. 2015-06-22 10:14 [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` [Bug tapsets/18571] " mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 8:06 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 13:56 ` dsmith at redhat dot com 2015-06-26 9:21 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571 Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dsmith at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/18571] Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. 2015-06-22 10:14 [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` [Bug tapsets/18571] " mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 13:56 ` dsmith at redhat dot com 2015-06-26 9:21 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-24 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571 --- Comment #2 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> --- In general the patch looks fine to me. However, I'm not sure about this change: ==== - uargs = user_string_quoted($uargs) + uargs = $uargs ==== I think you are on the right path here, that is an address, not a string. However, I think you should go a bit farther, deprecate the old string usage and rename the convenience variable to 'uargs_uaddr' to make sure users know this is a user address. The code would look something like: ==== %( systemtap_v <= "2.8" %? uargs = user_string_quoted($uargs) %) uargs_uaddr = $uargs ==== You would also need to make changes when printing the argstr (using the new variable name) and update the corresponding nd_syscall code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/18571] Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls. 2015-06-22 10:14 [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls mcermak at redhat dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-06-24 13:56 ` dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-26 9:21 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-06-26 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571 Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> --- Fixed in commit a7396f637e7c0c9083281b562d514506c465fc02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-26 9:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-06-22 10:14 [Bug tapsets/18571] New: Tapset support and test coverage for bpf and seccomp syscalls mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` [Bug tapsets/18571] " mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 8:06 ` mcermak at redhat dot com 2015-06-24 13:56 ` dsmith at redhat dot com 2015-06-26 9:21 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).