From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23401 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2015 20:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22381 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2015 20:32:09 -0000 From: "jistone at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/18597] long_arg() doesn't correctly handle negative values in 32-on-64 environment Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap X-Bugzilla-Component: tapsets X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jistone at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18597 --- Comment #11 from Josh Stone --- (In reply to David Smith from comment #9) > Created attachment 8403 [details] > better patch > > Here's a patch that is in a state ready to check in, assuming we like the > direction. It works everywhere I've tried it. Wrong patch? These are runtime/stat changes that you already pushed... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.