From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42331 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2015 13:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 42251 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jul 2015 13:45:25 -0000 From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/18597] long_arg() doesn't correctly handle negative values in 32-on-64 environment Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap X-Bugzilla-Component: tapsets X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dsmith at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18597 --- Comment #18 from David Smith --- (In reply to Martin Cermak from comment #17) > Created attachment 8410 [details] > testcase proposal > > (In reply to David Smith from comment #10) > > From what I can tell, we don't test using dwarfless parameters from uprobes. The test is a reasonable start, but it only tests compat long long handling. We'd really want to test all types using dwarfless parameters from a uprobe. Could you also open a new bug on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.