public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug runtime/18714] New: bring back   process.statement.absolute probes
@ 2015-07-24 14:51 fche at redhat dot com
  2018-11-10 18:05 ` [Bug runtime/18714] " agentzh at gmail dot com
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-07-24 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18714

            Bug ID: 18714
           Summary: bring back   process.statement.absolute probes
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: fche at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

While inode-uprobes makes $subject probe type not trivially available, we
should still be able to hack around it in the runtime.  Given the requested
virtual address, aat registration time we could walk the process address space,
find the inode & offset corresponding to that address (if any!), and place a
inode+offset uprobe there.  (This doesn't help non-inode gaps in the address
space, alas.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/18714] bring back   process.statement.absolute probes
  2015-07-24 14:51 [Bug runtime/18714] New: bring back process.statement.absolute probes fche at redhat dot com
@ 2018-11-10 18:05 ` agentzh at gmail dot com
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: agentzh at gmail dot com @ 2018-11-10 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18714

agentzh <agentzh at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |agentzh at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from agentzh <agentzh at gmail dot com> ---
We'll take a stab at implementing `process.statement(0xaddr)` first for
inode-based uprobes, with relative addresses in the executable files (including
DSO and PIE). This will pave a way to true DWARF-less probing (with the
existing @vma() facility which will get merge soon) as well as implementing our
own uretprobes without all the consequences from the kernel's uretprobes.
Messed up C stacks are really problematic for stack unwinding and resizable
stacks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-10 18:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-24 14:51 [Bug runtime/18714] New: bring back process.statement.absolute probes fche at redhat dot com
2018-11-10 18:05 ` [Bug runtime/18714] " agentzh at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).