public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug runtime/20131] New: listing_mode.exp wildcard library path failures
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-20131-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20131

            Bug ID: 20131
           Summary: listing_mode.exp wildcard library path failures
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dsmith at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

For a long while now, listing_mode.exp has had lots of failures. Commit 79be36d
improves the situation by making the test be more forgiving about 'stap -l'
output. There were times the test was expecting a full library path in the
output where 'stap -l' was outputting a relative path.

Originally, we were getting the following test numbers:

rhel6: 747 passes / 728 failures / 60 untested
rhel7: 899 passes / 792 failures / 36 untested
f23:   899 passes / 792 failures / 36 untested

With commit 79be36d, I'm getting:

rhel6: 1279 passes / 184 failures / 72 untested
rhel7: 1431 passes / 260 failures / 36 untested
f23:   1431 passes / 260 failures / 36 untested

So, where are the remaining failures coming from? Some are coming from bug
#18083 (listing_mode.exp fails on rhel6), related to line number problems.

The majority however are related to the following bug. At some point the
finding libraries using a wildcard stopped working, such as the following
command:

# stap -l process.library("*liblisting_mode.so").function("*") -c listing_mode

The function stap_list_cmd_lib in listing_mode.exp tries to find libraries 4
different ways: using a simple name ('.library("liblisting_mode.so")'), using a
relative name ('.library("./liblisting_mode.so")'), using the full path to the
library ('.library("/FOO/BAR/liblisting_mode.so")'), and using a wildcard
('.library("*liblisting_mode.so")'). Only the last variant fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23 15:46 dsmith at redhat dot com [this message]
2016-05-23 16:44 ` [Bug runtime/20131] " jistone at redhat dot com
2016-05-26 19:22 ` dsmith at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-20131-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).