From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-25863-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27282 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2018 17:55:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 27231 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2018 17:55:20 -0000
From: "ocket8888 at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug kprobes/22772] missing kernel/module debuginfo for custom lt kernel
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: systemtap
X-Bugzilla-Component: kprobes
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ocket8888 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-22772-6586-MMPtfyPjEu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22772-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22772-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2018-q1/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22772

--- Comment #17 from ocket8888 <ocket8888 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #16)
> My guess is that the debuginfo subrpm you have is not the Real Thing.  Ma=
ybe
> the kernel was configured without CONFIG_DEBUGINFO; maybe something else =
is
> messed up w.r.t. the way the dwarf files are separated.  Hard to know
> without the .spec file.
>=20
> It does not seem like systemtap's doing anything wrong.

It's definitely using CONFIG_DEBUGINFO (you can see for yourself in the con=
fig
I uploaded), which makes me think it's probably the spec file. I'm gonna up=
load
it in a second, once I get confirmation that there's no company secrets
embedded in the kernel specfile for some reason.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.