public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug runtime/22847] ARM OABI syscall tracing issues
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-22847-6586-FhahZipzDG@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-22847-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22847

--- Comment #12 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Gustavo Moreira from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Smith from comment #10)
> > I wonder if we've got to handle both ABIs at once (more like a 32-bit ia32
> > executable on a x86_64 kernel). Is CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT defined in your config
> > file?
> 
> exactly, CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y. I think so, because when that is enabled the
> kernel is able to execute both sort of ABI binaries.

OK, that makes more sense - I should have realized that earlier. Try the
following patch (which tries to use the kernel's syscall_get_nr()) with *both*
ABIs and see what syscall numbers you get:

====
diff --git a/runtime/syscall.h b/runtime/syscall.h
index 5ed019869..2b551f16f 100644
--- a/runtime/syscall.h
+++ b/runtime/syscall.h
@@ -169,7 +169,11 @@
 static inline long
 _stp_syscall_get_nr(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT
+       return syscall_get_nr(task, regs);
+#else
        return regs->ARM_r7;
+#endif
 }

 #elif defined(__mips__)
====

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-20 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-22847-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2018-02-15  6:01 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-15  6:09 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-15 15:45 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-02-15 16:08 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-02-16  4:06 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-19  6:55 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-19  7:02 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-19 14:31 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-02-19 22:42 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-19 22:53 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-02-20  1:05 ` mysecondaccountabc at gmail dot com
2018-02-20 16:03 ` dsmith at redhat dot com [this message]
2018-02-22  0:04 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-02-22 16:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-04-18  6:50 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-04-18  6:52 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-04-18  7:05 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-04-18  7:26 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-04-30 17:16 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-05-01  2:46 ` gmoreira at gmail dot com
2018-05-01 15:11 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2023-10-06 15:55 ` wcohen at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-22847-6586-FhahZipzDG@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).