[Bug translator/23866] dissonance between kernel tracepoint parametrization, lkm vs bpf

["wcohen at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23866

William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #11909|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #9 from William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 11912
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11912&action=edit
Revised version of the WIP bpf raw tracepoint support

Based on feedback previous bpf_raw_tracepoint patch.  This patch has the
following changes:

- NEWS entry
- Made behavior more predictable always use the bpf raw tracepoints unless
--compatible=4.1 used. if bpf raw tracepoints unavailable error out
- Simplified the logic
- Adjusted bpf.exp to work with the new behavior
- Increased bpf.exp timeout so tracepoint discovery has time to run in the
tests

In a separate patch I have a raw_tracepoint1.stp test that is a
reimplementation of the tracepoint1.stp using the bpf raw tracepoints
arguments.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.