public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "craig at 2ndquadrant dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug translator/26296] delay script-global locking until required
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:22:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26296-6586-I0DXCnt3IP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26296-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296

--- Comment #1 from craig at 2ndquadrant dot com ---
>
> IOW: defer locking to the first moment when any global is actually
> read/written, tracking locked-ness in a new context local.  This would
> involve
> only a small change to the translator, involving only context-free logic.
> That
> could later be optimized to remove repeated checks/etc. over multiple
> global vars in
> a control-flow / context aware way.
>
>
Even an explicit construct that scopes locking would be handy. Borrow from
Java's "synchronized" perhaps.

The fact that whole probes get locked is a serious limitation for one of my
systemtap use cases, where I inject delays and faults into the target
application. The probe flow is supposed to be something like:

global targets_map;

probe process("foo").mark("some_probe_point") {
  if (pid() in targets_map) {
      kdelay(100000);
  }
}

where kdelay is a simple embedded C wrapper around the kernel function of
the same name. But due to the locking on the global "targets_map", every
hit on "some_probe_point" will block on the lock held by the sleeping
probe. So probes can't inject sleeps or delays to try to trigger race
conditions.

So yes, the ability to take a lock over a narrower scope than the whole
probe would be very desirable.

I've wondered about the feasibility of doing this in embedded C, but
haven't had a chance to explore it properly yet.

This reminds me - is it ever safe to sleep in a systemtap probe, e.g. to
call ksleep()  rather than busy-loop?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23 15:40 [Bug translator/26296] New: " fche at redhat dot com
2020-07-24  5:22 ` Craig Ringer
2020-07-24 14:12   ` Arkady
2020-07-24  5:22 ` craig at 2ndquadrant dot com [this message]
2020-07-24 14:12 ` [Bug translator/26296] " arkady.miasnikov at gmail dot com
2020-08-04 19:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2020-08-10  6:32   ` Craig Ringer
2020-08-10  6:33 ` craig at 2ndquadrant dot com
2020-08-18 19:06 ` fche at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26296-6586-I0DXCnt3IP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).