[Bug translator/27933] New: Use of unitialized functioncall synthetic field in

["mark at klomp dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27933

            Bug ID: 27933
           Summary: Use of unitialized functioncall synthetic field in
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: mark at klomp dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

Running the helloworld.stp example under valgrind gives:

 ==113473== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
 ==113473==    at 0x1EE356:
functioncall_security_check::visit_embeddedcode(embeddedcode*)
(elaborate.cxx:3140)
 ==113473==    by 0x1EAC50: UnknownInlinedFun (elaborate.cxx:3110)
 ==113473==    by 0x1EAC50: symresolution_info::find_functions(functioncall*,
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >
const&, unsigned int, token const*) (elaborate.cxx:3268)
 ==113473==    by 0x1ED93B:
symresolution_info::visit_functioncall(functioncall*) (elaborate.cxx:2946)
 ==113473==    by 0x1E93BB: symresolution_info::visit_block(block*)
(elaborate.cxx:2610)
 ==113473==    by 0x1E93BB: symresolution_info::visit_block(block*)
(elaborate.cxx:2610)
 ==113473==    by 0x1E83E4: semantic_pass_symbols(systemtap_session&) [clone
.lto_priv.0] (elaborate.cxx:1977)
 ==113473==    by 0x19BCCE: UnknownInlinedFun (elaborate.cxx:2540)
 ==113473==    by 0x19BCCE: passes_0_4(systemtap_session&) (main.cxx:1049)
 ==113473==    by 0x18FB73: main (main.cxx:1534)
 ==113473==  Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
 ==113473==    at 0x4840FF5: operator new(unsigned long)
(vg_replace_malloc.c:417) 
 ==113473==    by 0x1C4E22: UnknownInlinedFun (parse.cxx:4044)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C4E22: parser::parse_value() (parse.cxx:3795)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C59E9: parser::parse_dwarf_value() (parse.cxx:3732)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C6C0D: UnknownInlinedFun (parse.cxx:3690)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C6C0D: parser::parse_unary() (parse.cxx:3664)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C6ECF: parser::parse_multiplicative() (parse.cxx:3625)
 ==113473==    by 0x1C7023: parser::parse_additive() (parse.cxx:3602)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BB25F: parser::parse_concatenation() (parse.cxx:3578)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BB39F: parser::parse_shift() (parse.cxx:3555)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BBCDB: UnknownInlinedFun (parse.cxx:3513)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BBCDB: parser::parse_array_in() (parse.cxx:3465)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BC2CF: parser::parse_boolean_and() (parse.cxx:3421)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BC40F: parser::parse_boolean_xor() (parse.cxx:3399)
 ==113473==    by 0x1BC54F: parser::parse_boolean_or() (parse.cxx:3377)

valgrind seems right, functioncall_security_check::visit_embeddedcode does:

  // Don't allow /* guru */ functions unless caller is privileged.
  if (!call->synthetic && !call->tok->location.file->privileged &&
      s->tagged_p ("/* guru */"))
    throw SEMANTIC_ERROR (_("function may not be used unless -g is specified"),
                          call->tok);

Checking the functioncall synthetic field.
But that seems never have been initialized at parse.cxx:4044 we see:

          struct functioncall* f = new functioncall;
          f->tok = t;
          f->function = name;

There are some code paths that set functioncall synthetic to true. Maybe the
default initialization should be false for this field?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.