From: "bill at broadley dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/28958] Current git + RHEL (4.18.0) has 3 working NFSd examples, and one broken.
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:27:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28958-6586-2ekoffbkNq@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28958-6586@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28958
--- Comment #7 from BillB <bill at broadley dot org> ---
No, but I could create one.
One of my summaries scripts produces this:
begin=1648245843
end=1648246023
Total ops for 180 seconds
base dir Operations IOPs IOPS%
Bandwidth bandwidth%
/nas-1-0/abcdefg/home/user99/.schrodinger 7358 40.88 2.30% 0
0.00%
/scratch/carsXY.Z9_rsm#z1-14-0-3e/fort.50 4312 23.96 1.35% 1832394
1.68%
/scratch/carsXY.Z9_rsm#z8-77-0-99/fort.50 4103 22.79 1.28% 2376893
2.18%
hosts: Operations
192.168.6.55:31235 37529 11.74%
192.168.5.51:17155 10623 3.32%
192.168.13.28:9219 6981 2.18%
192.168.6.15:57603 6973 2.18%
Operations
nfsd.proc4.write 146374 45.77%
nfsd.proc4.read 123553 38.64%
nfsd.proc4.lookup 20517 6.42%
nfsd.proc4.commit 19071 5.96%
nfsd.proc4.remove 7566 2.37%
nfsd.proc4.rename 2486 0.78%
nfsd.proc4.create 223 0.07%
I find it great for finding weird behavior, like say the above mentioned file
that's using zero bandwidth, but 40% of the OPS, turns out nearly all are
nfsd.proc4.lookup. Another common problem is this weird issue where c++
programs seek to X, write 4 byte, seek to X write 8 bytes, seek to X and write
12 bytes .... 4096 bytes, then seek to X+4096. So only 1 in 1024 writes are
actually kept.
Do scripts like this seem generally useful?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 19:06 [Bug runtime/28958] New: " bill at broadley dot org
2022-03-11 19:08 ` [Bug runtime/28958] " bill at broadley dot org
2022-03-11 19:11 ` [Bug testsuite/28958] " bill at broadley dot org
2022-03-17 20:18 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2022-03-17 21:49 ` bill at broadley dot org
2022-03-18 14:40 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2022-03-18 15:18 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2022-03-22 17:55 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2022-03-25 18:22 ` bill at broadley dot org
2022-03-25 20:02 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2022-03-25 22:27 ` bill at broadley dot org [this message]
2022-03-26 20:07 ` fche at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-28958-6586-2ekoffbkNq@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).