From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23509 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2006 16:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23483 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2006 16:25:27 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:25:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k03GPO5x019914 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:25:24 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k03GPJ128465; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:25:19 -0500 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k03GPIV1015862; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k03GPIXN001392; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:25:18 -0500 Received: (from fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k03GPIO1001389; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:25:18 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: toenail.toronto.redhat.com: fche set sender to fche@redhat.com using -f To: "Mao, Bibo" Cc: Subject: Re: function parameter access in kretprobe handler References: <9FBCE015AF479F46B3B410499F3AE05B08985B@pdsmsx405> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <9FBCE015AF479F46B3B410499F3AE05B08985B@pdsmsx405> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 bibo.mao@intel.com wrote: > I remembered that previously I saw some scripts where function > parameter is accessed in return probe function. But I think that > currently systemtap has not this capability. [...] Correct. Please see bug #1382. - FChE