From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26800 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2005 01:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26779 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2005 01:50:10 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: tooth.toronto.redhat.com: fche set sender to fche@redhat.com using -f To: Subject: Re: testing with "official" systemtap rpms References: <431F6036.8080302@redhat.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <431F6036.8080302@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 wcohen wrote: > [...] > with the "official" fc4 systemtap-0.4-1 rpm on i386 > [...] > kernel version: 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 > userspace version: version 0.4 built 2005-09-07 > FAIL: ./systemtap.base/kmodule.stp compilation > FAIL: profile > FAIL: syscalls-run (31) > [...] The systemtap.log file should provide useful information about these failures. Unless you report these simply to set expectations, it would be helpful to post the relevant dejagnu log excerpts. - FChE