From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23418 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2015 14:49:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21897 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2015 14:49:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:49:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85D8C230F; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche.csb (vpn-49-235.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.49.235]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t69EnaCV022654; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:49:36 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 31CBA5850A; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:50:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Josh Stone Cc: Zoltan Kiss , systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: Re: process().statement() doesn't seem to work References: <558DA0E3.9060904@linaro.org> <5591D73E.3010309@redhat.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5591D73E.3010309@redhat.com> (Josh Stone's message of "Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:39:42 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 jistone wrote: > [...] The behavior of .return variables is often suprising to > people. [...] But we cheat a little and also save values from the > *entry* of the function for you. That's most useful for the $$parms > string or any of the individual parameters. [...] Should we deprecate this behavior, now that the superceding @entry() construct is itself quite old? - FChE