From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4845 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2006 13:51:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 4838 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2006 13:51:59 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:51:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1RDpujs026916 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:56 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k1RDpu100331; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:56 -0500 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1RDptg2000883; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:55 -0500 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE078001FF; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1RDptoc024174; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:55 -0500 Received: (from fche@localhost) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k1RDpsdZ024171; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:51:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ton.toronto.redhat.com: fche set sender to fche@redhat.com using -f To: Richard J Moore Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Single-stepping with interrupts enabled. References: From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 richardj_moore wrote: > [...] The problem is down to the need to save state over the > single-step, so that pre- and post-processing either side of the > single-step can be correctly associated with each other. [...] How much of this would be simplified if we did away with support for post_handlers (which we don't use in systemtap)? - FChE