From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32007 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2009 14:10:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 31999 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2009 14:10:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:09:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2VE9Tg8031734; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:09:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2VE9Tf8031694; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:09:29 -0400 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2VE9S69028021; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:09:28 -0400 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2VE9Qh4011918; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:09:26 -0400 Received: (from fche@localhost) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n2VE9Qk8011917; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:09:26 -0400 To: ananth@in.ibm.com Cc: Diptopal Basu , systemtap@sourceware.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: Need more information on uProbes . References: <20090331130632.GA6358@in.ibm.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090331130632.GA6358@in.ibm.com> (Ananth N. Mavinakayanahalli's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:36:32 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00982.txt.bz2 ananth wrote: > Uprobes is implemented only for architectures that have utrace support > (x86-32, x86_64, powerpc, s390, but not IA64). [...] (HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK is on for ia64, sparc, sh also, so utrace per se should work there.) > [...] For ARM though, the utrace layer needs to be implemented and > uprobes ported over. [...] Roland et al., has there been any recent report on regset/tracehook-on-arm porting? - FChE