(no subject)

[@ 2016-12-08 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)]

>From overseers-return-13814-me=cgf.cx@sourceware.org Wed Nov 30 10:56:32 2016
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:55:49 -0500
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: cgf@sourceware.org
Cc: overseers@sourceware.org, cygwin@cygwin.com, cygsimple@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: DMARC - gmail.com or is it yahoo.com
Message-ID: <2016113015554900.GA29847@redhat.com>
References: <CACoZoo29vXpb0MzUri+NPJiZ5GSF+VZAykLa+JjS=g0VDEP7Pg@mail.gmail.com> <6d23d97b-98b3-f501-9992-b0e3b6b0d263@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6d23d97b-98b3-f501-9992-b0e3b6b0d263@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0
 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
 spammy=HTo:U*cgf, H*i:sk:6d23d97, H*MI:sk:6d23d97, H*f:sk:6d23d97
Lines: 14

Hi -

cygsimple wrote:

> See the description below of a problem that is occurring because of
> DMARC rules in place by yahoo.com.  Is there anything you can do for this?

cgf, any chance of updating our copy of ezmlm-toaster etc.?
Newer-than-2014 versions of ezmlm-idx seem to have some DMARC
capabilities.


- FChE