arc test again unsigned arc before dmarc (once)
Testing again and again. Now arc before dmarc.
This message should be dkim signed.
But this message isn't dkim signed...
yea?
openarc yea or nae
On 03/10/2023 16:00, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > This is a test patch to see if b4 can handle a git trailer with > parenthesis at the end Well I can't test this without a tag, now can I? Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> (code) -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers > > --- > gdb/MAINTAINERS | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gdb/MAINTAINERS b/gdb/MAINTAINERS > index 0286bf4ac4a..dd11d0e6b12 100644 > --- a/gdb/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/gdb/MAINTAINERS > @@ -88,13 +88,6 @@ trailers are used to identify who contributed and how. All patches pushed > upstream should have at least one Approved-By patches (with the exception of > obvious patches, see below). The trailers (or tags) currently in use are: > > - - Acked-By: > - > - Used when a contributor has taken a quick glance at a patch and agrees > - with the direction outlined in the commit message, but hasn't evaluated > - the code for correctness or regressions. > - Usage: "Acked-By: Your Name <your@email>" > - > - Tested-by: > > Used when a contributor has tested the patch and finds that it > @@ -111,6 +104,13 @@ obvious patches, see below). The trailers (or tags) currently in use are: > feel comfortable approving the patch. > Usage: "Reviewed-By: Your Name <your@email>" > > + - Acked-By: > + > + Used by a responsible or global maintainer when the patch touches multiple > + areas of GDB, but the maintainer does not want or is not able to approve > + all of them. When using this tag, add the area(s) at the end of the text. > + Usage: "Acked-By: Your Name <your@email> (area)" > + > - Approved-by: > > Used by responsible maintainers or global maintainers when a patch is
This is a test patch to see if b4 can handle a git trailer with parenthesis at the end --- gdb/MAINTAINERS | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/MAINTAINERS b/gdb/MAINTAINERS index 0286bf4ac4a..dd11d0e6b12 100644 --- a/gdb/MAINTAINERS +++ b/gdb/MAINTAINERS @@ -88,13 +88,6 @@ trailers are used to identify who contributed and how. All patches pushed upstream should have at least one Approved-By patches (with the exception of obvious patches, see below). The trailers (or tags) currently in use are: - - Acked-By: - - Used when a contributor has taken a quick glance at a patch and agrees - with the direction outlined in the commit message, but hasn't evaluated - the code for correctness or regressions. - Usage: "Acked-By: Your Name <your@email>" - - Tested-by: Used when a contributor has tested the patch and finds that it @@ -111,6 +104,13 @@ obvious patches, see below). The trailers (or tags) currently in use are: feel comfortable approving the patch. Usage: "Reviewed-By: Your Name <your@email>" + - Acked-By: + + Used by a responsible or global maintainer when the patch touches multiple + areas of GDB, but the maintainer does not want or is not able to approve + all of them. When using this tag, add the area(s) at the end of the text. + Usage: "Acked-By: Your Name <your@email> (area)" + - Approved-by: Used by responsible maintainers or global maintainers when a patch is -- 2.41.0
Test 2 Test 1 Test 30
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 100 bytes --] But now without a smiley. Those might really not get through. But multi-part text and html? Mark
frob
What else?
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 10:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> What else?
A reply to a test?
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 10:33 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 10:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > What else?
>
> A reply to a test?
And another test reply to a test reply to a test message...
no
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 83 bytes --] 3. one with both This is sent via gmail (which possibly sends both MIME types)...
Sorry for my slow response... 1. one with just text/plain
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 225 bytes --] Hi, Again with some html text and now a no-nodup address on CC. Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable?As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 223 bytes --] Hi, Again with some html text and now also nodup address on CC. Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable?As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
this is a real message
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 220 bytes --] Hi, Also some html text, sad. But now 8bit? And no-nodup CC? Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable?As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --] Hi again, Now without html text, but with attachment. And no-nodups on CC address. Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable? As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: a.s --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --] Hi again, Now without html text, but with attachment. Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable? As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: a.s --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 197 bytes --] Hi, Also some html text, sad Not really normal, but as a test might be acceptable? As long as the sentences are ok, the rest will follow. Lets see what the list says. Cheers, Mark [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --] .text .file 1 "foo/bar.s" .loc_mark_labels 1 .globl foobar .type foobar, %function foobar: .quad 0x1 .size foobar, .-foobar .globl baz .type baz, %function baz: .quad 0x1 .size baz, .-baz
And yet another test. 1 2 3 Frob forever