* Net game on Saturday?
@ 2004-08-25 22:33 tsbvc
2004-08-26 6:04 ` Robert Goulding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: tsbvc @ 2004-08-25 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7
There seems to be some interest in trying a network game of Xconq. Is
anyone interested in giving it a shot sometime on Saturday? The game will
be standard, with no limit on the maximum number of players. If anyone's
interested, I can look into starting an AIM or IRC chatroom for players to
work out the details.
-Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-25 22:33 Net game on Saturday? tsbvc
@ 2004-08-26 6:04 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-26 6:13 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Robert Goulding @ 2004-08-26 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tsbvc, xconq7
Tom <tsbvc@tds.net> wrote:
> There seems to be some interest in trying a network game of Xconq. Is
> anyone interested in giving it a shot sometime on Saturday? The game will
> be standard, with no limit on the maximum number of players. If anyone's
> interested, I can look into starting an AIM or IRC chatroom for players to
> work out the details.
That would be fun. For me, it would have to be post-9 pm EST on Saturday
(just my availability that day, not dictating when I think the game should
be). - Robert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-26 6:04 ` Robert Goulding
@ 2004-08-26 6:13 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-26 13:46 ` Robert Goulding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-26 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Goulding.2; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
> For me, it would have to be post-9 pm EST on Saturday
Looks like I could make any start time between noon Eastern and, say,
9pm Eastern (or slightly later).
(I assume you mean EDT and not EST).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-26 6:13 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2004-08-26 13:46 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-26 17:59 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-27 3:58 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Robert Goulding @ 2004-08-26 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
> > For me, it would have to be post-9 pm EST on Saturday
>
> Looks like I could make any start time between noon Eastern and, say,
> 9pm Eastern (or slightly later).
>
> (I assume you mean EDT and not EST).
>
Actually, I'm in the only place in the country (Indiana), which remains on
EST through the summer. Putting the clocks forward would confuse the
cows...
Robert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-26 13:46 ` Robert Goulding
@ 2004-08-26 17:59 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-27 3:50 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-27 3:58 ` Jim Kingdon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric McDonald @ 2004-08-26 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Goulding; +Cc: xconq7
Robert Goulding wrote:
>>>For me, it would have to be post-9 pm EST on Saturday
>>
>>Looks like I could make any start time between noon Eastern and, say,
>>9pm Eastern (or slightly later).
I might join in, even though I'll probably get slaughtered, since
nowadays I seem to think that Xconq is something one writes code for and
not something one plays (except to playtest new features and bug fixes).
> Actually, I'm in the only place in the country (Indiana), which remains on
> EST through the summer. Putting the clocks forward would confuse the
> cows...
Ah, you beat me to it. As a former Michigander who visited South Bend on
several occasions, I was about to mention this fact.
Eric
P.S. You have one of the nicest campuses I have ever visited. I mean
that both in the architectural sense and the hospitality sense.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-26 17:59 ` Eric McDonald
@ 2004-08-27 3:50 ` Robert Goulding
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Robert Goulding @ 2004-08-27 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric McDonald; +Cc: xconq7
On Aug 26, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Eric McDonald wrote:
> Robert Goulding wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm in the only place in the country (Indiana), which
>> remains on
>> EST through the summer. Putting the clocks forward would confuse the
>> cows...
>
> Ah, you beat me to it. As a former Michigander who visited South Bend
> on several occasions, I was about to mention this fact.
>
> Eric
>
> P.S. You have one of the nicest campuses I have ever visited. I mean
> that both in the architectural sense and the hospitality sense.
>
>
Thanks! we might be enjoying the place more if the thunderstorms and
torrential rain would let up...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-26 13:46 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-26 17:59 ` Eric McDonald
@ 2004-08-27 3:58 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-27 3:59 ` Jim Kingdon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-27 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7
> Actually, I'm in the only place in the country (Indiana), which remains on
> EST through the summer. Putting the clocks forward would confuse the
> cows...
Ah, yes, the timezone known as "East-Indiana". Although I see that
"date" outputs "EST" rather than 22:48 East-Indiana....
$ TZ=US/East-Indiana date
Thu Aug 26 22:48:14 EST 2004
$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-27 3:58 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2004-08-27 3:59 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-27 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kingdon; +Cc: xconq7
> Okay, I'll be on Undernet (channel #xconq) at 9:30 PM EST (10:30 EDT).
> Robert, Jim, and anyone else who wants to try a game, feel free to
> stop by so we can figure out the settings and options. Hope to see
> you there!
What version of xconq should we have built? CVS (as of when)?
One of the downloads?
The design of the remote protocol is such that the version must be
identical.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-28 16:24 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2004-08-28 18:03 ` Eric McDonald
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric McDonald @ 2004-08-28 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
Jim Kingdon wrote:
>>Well, if you don't mind building from sources, I'll just provide the
>>tarball
> That's better, actually. The sources are pretty sure to build and
> work here. Binaries are a matter of worrying about glibc versions and
> what-not.
Well, a source RPM would have been provided with the RPM packages, so I
don't know how much of a problem that would be. But, I'll do a tarball
anyway.
> Use your judgment. Whichever one you think is more likely to make it
> through the whole game without crashing. None of the features you
> mention strikes me as particularly essential (one way or the other).
Well, actually the scheduler improvements would allow you to finish your
turn naturally (i.e., without pressing 'Enter') when formations are in
use. Otherwise, you would tend to get stuck near the end (delay and
reserve are of no help in such case). But, if no one uses formations,
then I guess it is no big deal.
> My most recent game was with xconq from CVS with top ChangeLog entry
> of "2004-08-21 Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>" and I indeed made it to
> the end of game. For whatever that is worth.
Ah, quite recent. Must have been playtesting the attack/fire stuff....
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-28 4:53 ` Eric McDonald
@ 2004-08-28 16:24 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 18:03 ` Eric McDonald
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mcdonald; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
> Well, if you don't mind building from sources, I'll just provide the
> tarball
That's better, actually. The sources are pretty sure to build and
work here. Binaries are a matter of worrying about glibc versions and
what-not.
> Would you prefer a build against the most recent snapshot from the
> sources.redhat.com CVS server . . .
> Or, would you prefer a build against my local source tree, which has
Use your judgment. Whichever one you think is more likely to make it
through the whole game without crashing. None of the features you
mention strikes me as particularly essential (one way or the other).
My most recent game was with xconq from CVS with top ChangeLog entry
of "2004-08-21 Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>" and I indeed made it to
the end of game. For whatever that is worth.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-28 4:32 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2004-08-28 4:53 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 16:24 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric McDonald @ 2004-08-28 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
Jim Kingdon wrote:
>>Jim, if you have an RPM-based Linux system, I could produce a matching
>>set of RPM packages, Windows installer, and source tarball.
> So yes, if you provided those things I could use either the RPM or the
> sources.
Well, if you don't mind building from sources, I'll just provide the
tarball, because the RPM packages take longer to create.
I'll try to get them posted to my Web site sometime tomorrow afternoon.
Would you prefer a build against the most recent snapshot from the
sources.redhat.com CVS server (plus the scheduler modification
rollback/delay command fix that I posted a few days ago), which has
Hans' partially-completed attack/fire stuff?
Or, would you prefer a build against my local source tree, which has
scheduler buzzing reductions and efficiency improvements (with working
delay command), a bugfixed and improved SDL interface, a fix to the cXP
bug that Elijah reported recently, and improved UI responsiveness during
AI turns, but which does not have Hans' partially-completed attack/fire
stuff?
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-28 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
@ 2004-08-28 4:32 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 4:53 ` Eric McDonald
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-28 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mcdonald; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
> Jim, if you have an RPM-based Linux system, I could produce a matching
> set of RPM packages, Windows installer, and source tarball.
I have Red Hat 8.
So yes, if you provided those things I could use either the RPM or the
sources.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-28 3:55 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2004-08-28 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 4:32 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric McDonald @ 2004-08-28 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: tsbvc, xconq7
Jim Kingdon wrote:
>>Good call. I'm currently stuck on a WinXP machine, so the version I am
>>using now is the 8/08/2004 build.
>
>
> Hmm. I don't see that version for Linux.
Jim, if you have an RPM-based Linux system, I could produce a matching
set of RPM packages, Windows installer, and source tarball.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
2004-08-27 4:37 tsbvc
@ 2004-08-28 3:55 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2004-08-28 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tsbvc; +Cc: xconq7
> Good call. I'm currently stuck on a WinXP machine, so the version I am
> using now is the 8/08/2004 build.
Hmm. I don't see that version for Linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
@ 2004-08-27 4:37 tsbvc
2004-08-28 3:55 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: tsbvc @ 2004-08-27 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kingdon; +Cc: xconq7
>What version of xconq should we have built? CVS (as of when)?
>One of the downloads?
Good call. I'm currently stuck on a WinXP machine, so the version I am
using now is the 8/08/2004 build.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Net game on Saturday?
@ 2004-08-27 2:33 tsbvc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tsbvc @ 2004-08-27 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Goulding.2; +Cc: kingdon, xconq7
Okay, I'll be on Undernet (channel #xconq) at 9:30 PM EST (10:30 EDT).
Robert, Jim, and anyone else who wants to try a game, feel free to stop by
so we can figure out the settings and options. Hope to see you there!
-Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-28 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-25 22:33 Net game on Saturday? tsbvc
2004-08-26 6:04 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-26 6:13 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-26 13:46 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-26 17:59 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-27 3:50 ` Robert Goulding
2004-08-27 3:58 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-27 3:59 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-27 2:33 tsbvc
2004-08-27 4:37 tsbvc
2004-08-28 3:55 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 4:32 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 4:53 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 16:24 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-28 18:03 ` Eric McDonald
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).