From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1691 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2004 07:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1684 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 07:30:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail46.e.nsc.no) (193.213.115.46) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 07:30:30 -0000 Received: from Rufus (ti311110a000-0252.dialup.online.no [130.67.247.252]) by mail46.nsc.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i897UI8G022127 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <00cf01c4963e$e0a428d0$dbf74382@Rufus> From: "Andreas Bringedal" To: References: <1094671955.4338.71459.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: First stable version of improved ai_plan_research Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:39:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01145.txt.bz2 > A perfect AI would also have the following abilities for selecting > advances, all of which are (as far as I can tell) impossible to > implement in its current form: > > 1. Decide what kinds of units it wants, then choose the proper sequence > of advances to gain access to them. Doesn't the one that create the tech three place an AI-value of the techs that is of most use for AIs? Andreas