From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3017 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2003 20:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2981 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 20:44:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.168.188) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2003 20:44:13 -0000 Received: from adsl-67-122-115-247.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (sampln@sbcglobal.net@67.122.115.247 with plain) by smtp-sbc-v1.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2003 20:44:13 -0000 Subject: Re: Important changes in the Xconq API From: Lincoln Peters To: Hans Ronne Cc: Xconq list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1056315308.3956.699.camel@odysseus.peterslan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:02:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 Another approach might be to make the terrain incapable of holding a unit (i.e. set unit-size-in-terrain to 99) and set exclusive capacity via terrain-capacity-x. It would probably be the best solution for trains on railroads, trucks on highways, etc., unless more than one type of unit is supposed to use the connection.