From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21987 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 04:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21980 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 04:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.168.185) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 04:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 6-allhosts) (sampln@sbcglobal.net@64.175.248.254 with plain) by smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 04:40:06 -0000 Subject: Re: annoying new bug in movement From: Lincoln Peters To: Eric McDonald Cc: Xconq list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072154605.31574.1995.camel@odysseus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:05:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg01105.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 20:25, Eric McDonald wrote: > That is the error notification that I added to the code. > As I mentioned, but perhaps was not clear, I made no serious > attempt to isolate the underlying problem. My "fix" was just to > deaden the pain somewhat. > > I don't really feel responsible for this bug (aside from checking > in the patch (from someone else) that likely introduced it), and > thus am not feeling highly motivated to fix it at this point. It is certainly less painful, now that it doesn't burn an ACP. And I'm still trying to find a pattern that would indicate the exact location of the bug. Meanwhile, I also noticed that I no longer seem to be able to issue move commands to units if the move command would leave them inside another unit (e.g. I tell a battledroid to move into a base). However, I can still have one unit occupy another if they are adjacent to each other. I'm not yet sure if this odd behavior is restricted to bolodd2.g or not. -- Lincoln Peters