From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30875 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2004 02:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30772 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2004 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2004 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from [67.172.156.222] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <200406120217080130099v01e>; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:17:09 +0000 Subject: Re: Building for OSX From: Eric McDonald To: Robert Goulding Cc: Stan Shebs , Hans Ronne , xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <001901c45021$2b0335b0$feb3fea9@blackbox> References: <40CA3B15.2040509@apple.com> <001901c45021$2b0335b0$feb3fea9@blackbox> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1087006427.8279.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:17:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00534.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 20:01, Robert Goulding wrote: > So the Carbon build available from the webpage is done with .. what? Hans uses CodeWarrior for all of his builds, I think. And he is the one who created all the Mac stuff on the downloads page. > Sorry > to be dim; I've only recently changed from Linux to Mac OSX, so my only > experience of compilation is configure - make; but when I try this on the > CVS code, it gets hung-up when linking to the tcl libraries. (Sorry can't > be more specific; I'm away from my Mac). Please let me know what the exact problem is, when you can. I would like to try to patch 'aclocal.m4' so that configure will do the right thing with the Tcl configuration variables on the Mac. I don't have a modern (or even semi-modern) Mac so I can't test the changes myself. > Are there any tips for getting a > Carbonised app to compile using straightforward configure and make, and gcc > etc? I think you are blazing the trail. Eric