From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27456 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2004 01:45:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27448 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 01:45:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gencom001.gencom.us) (208.45.97.129) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 01:45:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gencom001.gencom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68E46110; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gencom001.gencom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gencom001.gencom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23662-08; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from osts (home [67.171.201.213]) by gencom001.gencom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247FB60AB; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: CVS Monitor Online From: "D. Cooper Stevenson" Reply-To: cstevens@gencom.us To: Eric McDonald Cc: Xconq Mailing List In-Reply-To: <415A11F5.201@phy.cmich.edu> References: <1096349979.6661.0.camel@localhost> <415A11F5.201@phy.cmich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: General Computer Message-Id: <1096422642.6890.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:18:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gencom001 X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01278.txt.bz2 You are correct. I will have this in the next few days. Right now I am reviewing your past emails regarding layering, etc. and am working through the system's architecture. -Coop On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:37, Eric McDonald wrote: > D. Cooper Stevenson wrote: > > > http://www.xconq.org/cvsmonitor > > Decent. But I notice that the top-level files don't show up. > > Eric > > General P.S to no one in particular: > The CVS commit activity (Activity by Author) summaries at: > http://www.xconq.org/cvsmonitor?repository=Xconq_CVS&cmd=viewBrowseRepository > are quite interesting, though pretty much as I expected. I am not going > to try to imply anything in the way of metrics, but 3 of the 4 top CVS > committers have similar add:remove and add:change ratios; the other one > doesn't. I had suspected this picture from mailing list and changelog > evidence, but to see it quantified solidifies it as fact.... -- -------------------------------------------------------------- | Cooper Stevenson | Em: cooper@gencom.us | | GenCom | Ph: 541.924.9434 | | "Working For IT" | Www: http://www.gencom.us | --------------------------------------------------------------