From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29544 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2004 22:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29534 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2004 22:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.170.81) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2004 22:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (sampln@sbcglobal.net@64.175.251.169 with plain) by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2004 22:56:21 -0000 Subject: Re: New Windows Installer and Source Tarballs From: Lincoln Peters To: Elijah Meeks Cc: Xconq list In-Reply-To: <20041010225159.62809.qmail@web13126.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041010225159.62809.qmail@web13126.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1097449153.4188.3556.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:59:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01345.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 15:51, Elijah Meeks wrote: > > There are a number of bugfixes in the new > > prelease. Also, there are > > It doesn't seem like looks-like and see-mistake-chance > do what they're supposed to? Is this the case or are > my tables still screwy? I've played with see-mistake-chance and looks-like, but I never thoroughly tested them because the AI didn't understand the subtle tactical value of a unit that looks like another unit. What do your tables look like? --- Lincoln Peters I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else. -- Winston Churchill