From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6104 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2005 15:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6080 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 15:50:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.170.80) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 15:50:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (sampln@sbcglobal.net@64.175.250.200 with plain) by smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 15:50:23 -0000 Subject: Re: Xconq Mailing Lists - Please Read From: Lincoln Peters To: Eric McDonald Cc: xconq7 In-Reply-To: <42568041.1030206@phy.cmich.edu> References: <361003547f62ecc5a8b03b9d1cf31872@gmail.com> <1112963986.15810.231418879@webmail.messagingengine.com> <42568041.1030206@phy.cmich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1112975421.29266.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 06:59 -0600, Eric McDonald wrote: > > Or am I the only person who managed to not make the transition? Weird. > > The Sourceforge mailing lists have been mentioned on this list before, > but, no, I don't think you're the only one who has not made the transition. I noticed that the home page on RedHat's server makes no mention of the move to the SourceForge site. In fact, it apparently has not been updated since May 24 of last year. That could easily be a source of confusion for a lot of people, especially as long as Google lists the RedHat site at the top of the search results when someone does a search for "Xconq" (Coop's website is listed second, and the SourceForge site is listed eighth). --- Lincoln Peters You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.