From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18827 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2003 20:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18820 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 20:22:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.panix.com) (166.84.1.74) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2003 20:22:17 -0000 Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D253398667; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:22:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kingdon@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id h5MKMCY14997; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:22:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 20:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200306222022.h5MKMCY14997@panix5.panix.com> From: Jim Kingdon To: emcdonal@cps.cmich.edu Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Eric McDonald on Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:24:53 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: Important changes in the Xconq API References: <200306220257.h5M2vjU07318@panix5.panix.com> X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 > * Remarks that the capacity-negation table has been pulled from GDL. I don't understand this one. unit.c (can_occupy_conn_1) has a reference to ut_capacity_neg.