From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-2287-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4737 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2003 14:32:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4730 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2003 14:32:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.panix.com) (166.84.1.74)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2003 14:32:42 -0000
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CB0F098285; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from kingdon@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id h8FEWfW07841;
	Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:24:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200309151432.h8FEWfW07841@panix5.panix.com>
From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>
To: hronne@telia.com
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <l03130300bb89f3e93f91@[212.181.162.155]> (message from Hans
	Ronne on Mon, 15 Sep 2003 05:50:45 +0200)
Subject: Re: Cconq
References:  <l03130300bb89f3e93f91@[212.181.162.155]>
X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2

> We should probably remove the -host and -join options and all
> references to them, to prevent confusion.

Yes, we should.

Fixing them might be a better idea for cconq than trying to do curses
connect dialogs, but that's not really an excuse for keeping around
the broken current implementation (and confusing code).