From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12506 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2003 15:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12499 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 15:39:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.panix.com) (166.84.1.72) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 15:39:35 -0000 Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785E54873B; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:39:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kingdon@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id h9JFdZD25591; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:39:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200310191539.h9JFdZD25591@panix5.panix.com> From: Jim Kingdon To: hronne@comhem.se Cc: pgarrone@acay.com.au, xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Hans Ronne on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:15:22 +0200) Subject: Re: Xconq bug fixes + binaries References: X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 > However, you will have to accept that patches are checked and bugs are > fixed before inclusion Hopefully it is understood by all that any submission will get modified (if not immediately, then eventually as xconq evolves). There is one legitimate complaint here, though, and that is how it is described in the ChangeLog. I've added the word "(modified)" to make it clear that what was checked in contains work from both Peter Garonne and Hans Ronne.