From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-2619-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12834 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 04:05:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12823 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 04:04:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web13106.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.151)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 04:04:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20031118040458.7380.qmail@web13106.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [64.169.88.58] by web13106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:04:58 PST
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:26:00 -0000
From: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Marketing Xconq
To: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311172234270.23006-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00748.txt.bz2


> The occupant view seems to be a recurring theme.

Yep, and the way xconq treats occupant combat makes it
worse.  The way it works now, every occupant is
subject to an attack on the transport.  If there were
a way to change this so that an attack only affects
one occupant, it'd not only work in this case but in
the case of fortresses.  
 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree