From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8407 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2004 20:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8264 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2004 20:54:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.panix.com) (166.84.1.72) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2004 20:54:19 -0000 Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695E548725; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 16:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kingdon@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i65KsJf11872; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 16:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200407052054.i65KsJf11872@panix5.panix.com> From: Jim Kingdon To: cwood@cs.pdx.edu Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Christopher Wood on Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:26:55 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: Question on combat procedures References: <17030786.1088898907645.JavaMail.root@skeeter.psp.pas.earthlink.net> <40E749CD.9000905@phy.cmich.edu> X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00662.txt.bz2 > The only place I could find something that even fits that is > action.def where it seemed it went according to the following list. You should probably see Eric's email which is more likely to be the answer to your question than what I'm going to say, but here's the deal on action.def (and by extension, the rest of the .def files which are used quite a bit). The idea is that something can #define DEF_ACTION and then #include action.def. So for example, actions.c builds up a table actiondefns (with only 3 of the items from DEF_ACTION). And kernel.h declares the prep functions. The whole can be hard to follow, yes. But it does allow putting a bunch of things pertaining to an action in one place, rather than scattered about.